Board Diversity: A MANDATE FOR LISTED ENTITIES
Diversity is a key factor that is
receiving increasing attention from regulators, investors, and other
stakeholders. Regulation 17 (1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India
(SEBI) Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements (LODR) Regulations,
2015, which mandates the composition of the board of directors of a listed
entity. The regulation specifies that the board of directors must have an
optimal combination of executive and non-executive directors, with at least one
woman director. Additionally, not less than 50% of the board of directors must
comprise of non-executive directors.
The regulation further states
that the top 1000 listed entities must have at least one independent woman
director. This requirement is in addition to having an optimal combination of
executive and non-executive directors. The top 1000 entities are determined
based on their market capitalization as at the end of the immediate previous
financial year.
Furthermore, if the chairperson
of the board of directors is a non-executive director, at least one-third of
the board of directors must comprise of independent directors. If the listed
entity does not have a regular non-executive chairperson, at least half of the
board of directors must comprise of independent directors. In the latter case,
if the regular non-executive chairperson is a promoter of the listed entity or
related to any promoter or person occupying management positions at the level
of the board of directors or at one level below the board of directors, at
least half of the board of directors of the listed entity must consist of
independent directors.
In addition, the board of
directors of the top 2000 listed entities must comprise of not less than six
directors, with effect from April 1, 2020. The top 2000 entities are determined
based on their market capitalization as at the end of the immediate previous
financial year.
If the listed company has
outstanding SR equity shares, at least half of the board of directors must
comprise of independent directors and no listed entity shall appoint a person
or continue the directorship of any person as a non-executive director who has
attained the age of seventy-five years unless a special resolution is passed to
that effect. The explanatory statement annexed to the notice for such a motion
must indicate the justification for appointing such a person.
The listed entity shall ensure
that the approval of shareholders for appointment or re-appointment of a person
on the board of directors or as a manager is taken at the next general meeting
or within a time period of three months from the date of appointment, whichever
is earlier. A public sector company must ensure that the approval of the
shareholders for appointment or re-appointment of a person on the board of
directors or as a manager is taken at the next general meeting.
If a person, including a managing
director or a whole-time director or a manager, was earlier rejected by the
shareholders at a general meeting, the appointment or re-appointment of such a
person must be done only with the prior approval of the shareholders. The
statement referred to under sub-section (1) of section 102 of the Companies
Act, 2013, annexed to the notice to the shareholders, for considering the
appointment or re-appointment of such a person earlier rejected by the
shareholders must contain a detailed explanation and justification by the
Nomination and Remuneration Committee and the Board of directors for
recommending such a person for appointment or re-appointment.
Regulation 17 (1) is significant for listed entities in India as it ensures that the board of directors is composed of individuals with diverse backgrounds and expertise. The provision mandates that the board of directors must comprise of a mix of executive and non-executive directors, with at least one woman director.

Comments
Post a Comment