RULES OF LAW

Supreme Court Civil Appeal No 527 of 2023 Securities and Exchange Board of India Versus V. Shankar filed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India under Section 15Z of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992 arises from a judgment dated 1 November 2022 of the Securities Appellate Tribunal. The Securities Appellate Tribunal, while allowing the appeal by the respondent, set aside an order dated 22 March 2022 of the Whole Time Member under Section 15HA of the SEBI Act by which a penalty of Rs Ten lakhs was imposed on the respondent for violating of Sections 68 and 77A of the Companies Act 1956 and Regulations 3(a), ( b), (c), (d), 4(1), 4(2)(f), (k) and (r) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to the Securities Market) Regulations 2003 read with Sections 12A (a), (b) and (c) of the SEBI Act. The respondent was a Company Secretary of Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited for two years, 2009-10 and 2010-...

The Company’s Memorandum of association represents its charter as it defines the objects for which it has been setup. In Cotman Vs. Brougham (1918)AC 514, it was observed that “the purpose of memorandum is to enable the shareholders, creditors and those dealing with the company to know what is its permitted range of enterprise”. The Memorandum of association sets out the boundaries beyond which the company cannot traverse. Any action of a company which is beyond the memorandum is ultra virus and void and incapable of being ratified. Where there is no connection or nexus between the power exercised and the attainment of an object, the exercise of such power shall be deemed to be ultra virus. Section 4(1) of the Companies Act 2013   provides the relevant information that a Memorandum of association shall provide, which includes, in sub-clause (a) the name of the company; in sub-clause (b) the State in which the registered office of the company is to be situated; in sub-Clause (c)...

In civil   appeal no. 2776 OF 2022 in the matter of MAHIMA DATLA VERSUS DR. RENUKA DATLA & ORS. Supreme Court of India held that Duomatic Principle is applicable even in the Indian context. Strict adherence to a statutory requirement may be dispensed with if it is demonstrated any act that the members of a company can do by formal resolution in a general meeting is done with the consent of all the members of the Company. Although this Principle is only applicable in those cases wherein bona fide transactions are involved in case of fraud this principal is a clear exception. The Duomatic Principle can be briefly stated as “anything the members of a company can do by formal resolution in a general meeting, they can also do informally, if all of them assent to it.” This Principle was derived from the decision In Re: Duomatic Ltd., [1969] 2 Ch. 365, wherein Buckley, J. held as under: “where it can be shown that all shareholders who have a right to attend and vote at a general m...

  Court while hearing objections under the scope of section 34 of the arbitration act cannot interfere unless the findings and conclusions of the arbitrator are totally perverse and illegal. Perversity of the award goes to the root of the matter without there being a possibility of alternative interpretation which may sustain the arbitral award. Perversity or irrationality of decisions is tested on the touchstone of Wednesbury principle of reasonableness. Decisions that fall short of the standards of reasonableness are open to challenge in a court of law often in writ jurisdiction of the superior courts but no less in statutory processes wherever the same are available. Intervention of the courts is envisaged in few circumstances only like in case of fraud or bias by the arbitrators; violation of principal of natural justice etc. courts can correct the error of arbitrator. An award contrary to substantive provisions of law or the provisions of Arbitration and conciliation Act, ...

Article 226: Power of High Courts to issue certain writs 1)     Notwithstanding anything in Article 32 every High Court shall have powers, throughout the territories in relation to which it exercise jurisdiction, to issue to any person or authority, including in appropriate cases, any Government, within those territories directions, orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibitions, quo warranto and certiorari, or any of them, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by Part III and for any other purpose. 2)    The power conferred by clause (1) to issue directions, orders or writs to any Government, authority or person may also be exercised by any High Court exercising jurisdiction in relation to the territories within which the cause of action, wholly or in part, arises for the exercise of such power, notwithstanding that the seat of such Government or authority or the residence of such person is not within th...

Insolvency and bankruptcy Code, 2016 is to ensure revival and continuation of the Corporate Debtor, where liquidation would be the last resort and scheme and structure of the code should be interpreted keeping in view the objectives of the code. Supreme Court of India in the matter of Jaypee Kensington Boulevard Apartments Welfare Association & ORS. VS NBCC (India) Ltd. & ors. observed the same. The code is a linear process that both creditors and debtors follow when insolvency is triggered; a collective mechanism for resolving insolvency within a framework of equity and fairness to all stakeholders to preserve economic value in the process; a time bound process either ends in keeping the firm as a going enterprise, or liquidates and distributes the assets to the various stakeholders. The Preamble of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. 2016 gives an insight into what is sought to be achieved by the Code. Preamble states the code as: “An Act to consolidate and amend the laws r...

BSE on 31.03.2021 issued circular no.  20210331-2 and stated that the exchange  has introduced facility of filing of Annual Secretarial Compliance Report in XBRL mode under Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing  Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 with immediate effect as per SEBI Circular CIR/CFD/CMD1/27/2019 dated February 08,2019. The disclosure to the Stock Exchange(s) shall be made by listed entities within 60 days of end of the Financial year. The listed companies are required to submit Annual Secretarial compliance report in PDF mode along with the submission of the Annual Secretarial compliance report in XBRL mode.