RULES OF LAW

Unstamped arbitration agreements are not enforceable in law, and failure to pay the requisite stamp duty can have serious implications on the enforceability of the agreement. The recent decision by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No(s). 3802-3803 of 2020 N.N. Global Mercantile Private Limited Versus Indo Unique Flame Ltd. & Ors. has clarified the legal position on the enforceability of unstamped arbitration agreements. The Court held that an instrument, which is exigible to stamp duty, such as an arbitration agreement, cannot be said to be enforceable if it is not stamped or is insufficiently stamped. This decision has far-reaching implications on the enforceability of unstamped agreements containing arbitration clauses, and has redefined the legal position on this issue. Section 2(h) of the Contract Act defines a contract as an agreement enforceable by law, while Section 2(g) defines an agreement as a promise or set of promises enforceable by law. An unstamped agreement, the...

The Doctrine of Frustration: When Contractual Obligations Become Impossible Contracts are the backbone of commercial transactions, but what happens when circumstances change beyond the control of the parties, making it impossible to perform the obligations under the contract? Contracts form the basis of business transactions, with parties relying on each other to fulfill their obligations. However, there are times when unforeseen events or circumstances arise, rendering it impossible to perform the contract. This is where the doctrine of frustration comes into play. Under section 56 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a contract can be discharged on the grounds of subsequent impossibility if an unexpected event or change of circumstances occurs, which was beyond the control of the parties and fundamentally alters the purpose or basis of the contract. The use of the word "impossible" in this context does not refer to literal or physical impossibility but rather the impract...

The principle of prospective operation of statutes is a fundamental aspect of legal interpretation that is crucial to upholding the rights of individuals, and it is essential for legal practitioners, business leaders, and the individuals to understand its implications. The settled rule of interpretation is that any amendment to a statute that affects the legal rights of an individual must be presumed to be prospective, unless it is expressly or impliedly retrospective. This principle is fundamental to the interpretation of all legislation and ensures that the rights of individuals are protected under the law. When a repeal of an enactment is followed by a fresh legislation, such legislation does not affect the substantive rights of the parties on the date of the suit or adjudication of the suit, unless it is retrospective. This means that a court of appeal cannot take into consideration a new law brought into existence after the judgment appealed from has been rendered, as the righ...

  Section 186 Loan and Investment by Company: A Comprehensive Guide to Compliances Companies frequently engage in loan transactions and investments to finance their operations and grow their business. However, these transactions need to comply with legal requirements to prevent fraud and protect stakeholders' interests. The Companies Act, 2013, provides regulations for loans and investments made by companies, including the maximum limit, conditions for exemptions, and compliances to be followed. In this article, we will discuss Section 186 of the Companies Act, 2013, and the checklist for its compliances. Section 186 of the Companies Act, 2013, restricts companies from directly or indirectly giving loans, guarantees, or securities to any person or body corporate exceeding 60% of its paid-up share capital, free reserves, and securities premium account, or 100% of its free reserves and securities premium account, whichever is more. The word "person" above does not include a...

In today's securities market, investor confidence is paramount, and an efficient grievance redressal mechanism is essential to ensure that investors have faith in the system. According to Regulation 13 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, a listed entity shall ensure that adequate steps are taken for the expeditious redressal of investor complaints. The listed entity shall also register on the SCORES platform or another electronic platform mandated by the Board to handle investor complaints electronically. The entity shall file a statement with the recognized stock exchange(s) on a quarterly basis, indicating the number of investor complaints pending, received, disposed of, and unresolved during the quarter. An efficient grievance redressal mechanism is vital for investor confidence. Investors must feel that their concerns and complaints are heard and addressed in a timely and effective manner. The pr...

  In the world of securities and exchange, the appointment of a qualified compliance officer is not only a regulatory obligation but a crucial step towards ensuring the letter and spirit of the law. As per Regulation 6 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, every listed entity is required to appoint a qualified company secretary as the compliance officer. The compliance officer is tasked with various responsibilities that range from ensuring conformity with regulatory provisions, co-ordination with the board, stock exchanges and depositories, to monitoring the grievance redressal division. From a legal perspective, the role of the compliance officer in a listed entity cannot be overstated. The compliance officer ensures that the correct procedures have been followed, which leads to the accuracy, authenticity, and comprehensiveness of information, statements, and reports filed by the listed entity under ...

The Companies Act, 2013 provides for various legal mechanisms that can be used by companies to restructure their operations, consolidate their assets, and achieve economies of scale. Two commonly used mechanisms are compromise and arrangement. Compromise and arrangement refer to a legal process under which a company can restructure its debt or equity capital, or both, in a manner that is acceptable to its shareholders and creditors. This process involves negotiations between the company and its stakeholders, followed by a court-approved plan of compromise and arrangement. The term “compromise” is not defined under Companies Act, 2013 and it has no legal meaning. Generally, Compromise presupposes a dispute. Compromise is an expression which implies the existence of a dispute such as relating to rights, which it seeks to settle. There can be no compromise unless there is some dispute e.g. as to the power to enforce rights or as to what those rights are. Arrangement contemplates all...

As per the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, a listed entity is required to appoint a share transfer agent or manage the share transfer facility in-house. This ensures that the transfer of securities is carried out in an efficient and transparent manner. If the listed entity manages the share transfer facility in-house and the total number of holders of securities exceeds one lakh, the entity must either register with the Board as a Category II share transfer agent or appoint a Registrar to an issue and share transfer agent registered with the Board. This ensures that the entity is able to manage the share transfer facility effectively and efficiently. The listed entity must ensure that all activities related to the share transfer facility are maintained either in-house or by a Registrar to an issue and share transfer agent registered with the Board. This ensures that the transfer of securities is carried out in a secure and transparent manne...

In civil   appeal no. 2776 OF 2022 in the matter of MAHIMA DATLA VERSUS DR. RENUKA DATLA & ORS. Supreme Court of India held that Duomatic Principle is applicable even in the Indian context. Strict adherence to a statutory requirement may be dispensed with if it is demonstrated any act that the members of a company can do by formal resolution in a general meeting is done with the consent of all the members of the Company. Although this Principle is only applicable in those cases wherein bona fide transactions are involved in case of fraud this principal is a clear exception. The Duomatic Principle can be briefly stated as “anything the members of a company can do by formal resolution in a general meeting, they can also do informally, if all of them assent to it.” This Principle was derived from the decision In Re: Duomatic Ltd., [1969] 2 Ch. 365, wherein Buckley, J. held as under: “where it can be shown that all shareholders who have a right to attend and vote at a general m...

Article 226: Power of High Courts to issue certain writs 1)     Notwithstanding anything in Article 32 every High Court shall have powers, throughout the territories in relation to which it exercise jurisdiction, to issue to any person or authority, including in appropriate cases, any Government, within those territories directions, orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibitions, quo warranto and certiorari, or any of them, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by Part III and for any other purpose. 2)    The power conferred by clause (1) to issue directions, orders or writs to any Government, authority or person may also be exercised by any High Court exercising jurisdiction in relation to the territories within which the cause of action, wholly or in part, arises for the exercise of such power, notwithstanding that the seat of such Government or authority or the residence of such person is not within th...